Analysis Of All Summer On The Planet Of Venus And...

By: Kahramon Ergashev The SEEALL Academy Kahramon Ergashev Class 704 October 25, 2017 Compare and Contrast Essay How would you feel if you were bullied for being different from everyone else? Well, in the passage, All Summer In A Day, and, Raymond s Run, the main protagonists Margot and Raymond are like that. Margot was an earthling on the planet of Venus and Raymond was born with a disability. The situation that they are in is somewhat similar. In both of the novels, the protagonists are bullied because they are both different, but the outcomes of bullying in each of the story are different. The message that the authors are trying to give the readers is also†¦show more content†¦On the other hand, the children on Venus haven’t seen the sun in seven years because on Venus, the sun comes up only two hours every seven years while raining every other time. For example on page 3 of the text, the author stated, â€Å"And then, of course, the biggest crime of all was that she had come here only five years ago from earth, and she remembered the sun and the way the sun was and the sky was when she was four in Ohio.† This proves why the children in her class bully her because they are jealous that she got to see the sun a bunch of times and that is the reason they bully her. Raymond in the story, â€Å"Raymond’s Run,† is also a victim of bullying. He is bullied because he has a disability which people call, â€Å"The pumpkin head,† because he is mentally disabled and has a big head because of it. For instance, the author stated on page 25, the author stated, â€Å"I never walk if I can trot, and shame on Raymond if he can’t keep up. But of course he does, cause if he hangs back someone’s liable to walk up to him and get smart, or take his allowance from him, or ask where he got the big pumpkin head.† This means that people bully him when he is alone to make fun of him and feel better because of it. Although the protagonists from each story get bullied, the results of the bullying differ in some ways. In the novel, â€Å"All Summer In A Day,† Margot’s bullies regretted what they had done to Margot. For instance, the author stated on page 6, â€Å"They stood as ifShow MoreRelatedOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pagessituates organization theory within the scholarly debates on modernism and postmodernism, and provides an advanced introduction to the heterogeneous study of organizations, including chapters on phenomenology, critical theory and psychoanalysis. Like all good textbooks, the book is accessible, well researched and readers are encouraged to view chapters as a starting point for getting to grips with the field of organization theory. Dr Martin Brigham, Lancaster University, UK McAuley et al. provide a

Law Factual Summary Free Essays

Factual Summary Susie is a minor, who choose to meet friends at a park at 1 1 pm, when the city law clearly states that a curfew is enforced for anyone after 1 1 pm in the park. Officer ruthless enforced the law, but and the law also states that a person can ride In back of a camper with no seat belt. Jerry a minor with little to no driving knowledge skills was giving Susie and Kathy a ride. We will write a custom essay sample on Law Factual Summary or any similar topic only for you Order Now The total time from the Incident to when the truck got In accident was 1 hour and a half, Susie lived a mile from the park. The officer loud of either escorted Susie home thus not causing the Incident, or let her walk. But In the end each person Is entitled to their mistakes. Legal Issues In the case of Susie v City of Elsewhere and Officer Ruthless, Is It negligence In the part of Susie and her friends knowing that they were violating the 1 1 :Mom curfew for being In the park? Was Officer Ruthless also at fault for neglecting the comment that Susie stated to him, â€Å"she only lived a few blocks from the park†, and not escorting or letting her go home to prevent the accident? The final questions, I as a Judge would ask, is during the one and half hour time span from when the minors were told to leave the park by Officer Ruthless, What events occurred to make the driver get in an accident? Did the minors partake in illegal activities, I. E. Drinking and driving, or illegal drugs? Was there a toxicology report filed from the scene of the crime? There are many avenues of approach that I as a Judge would need to know such as reports to properly handle and file who is at fault in this case. Without the actual evidence from both sides, it will be unclear to know who is liable and who is not. Legal Concept This case is based on the legal concept of minors breaking the law, which in this matter was the 1 1 :Mom curfew. They had known of this law and yet morally choose not to obey it, and instead of going home as instructed by Officer Ruthless, Susie Marks, and her two friends decided to hang out for another hour and a half, thus resulting in the accident. In the state which this case is filed in, the law states it is k to have a passenger ride in the cab of the truck without a settable. Certain laws need to be revamped since this is clearly now a safe way to transport passengers, especially after midnight, when most accidents tend to occur. Analysis/Conclusion With properly reading the statements from both Susie Marks and Officer Ruthless, It Is clear that even though the Officer had told all the parties involved with Susie to leave, they choose to do other activities not relating to the park. The City of Elsewhere and Officer Ruthless cannot be at fault for the time between 1 1 :MOM and the time of the accident. The officer did his Job by obeying the laws and guidelines and Susie and her friends clearly did what they wanted to and as a result got Involved In the accident. Justice is blind but It Is the duty of each Individual to look out for one another In the Interest of life. Negligence on Susie Marks and her friends’ behalf led to the accident. Law Factual Summary By greengrocery’s ruthless enforced the law, but and the law also states that a person can ride in back was giving Susie and Kathy a ride. The total time from the incident to when the truck to in accident was 1 hour and a half, Susie lived a mile from the park. The officer could of either escorted Susie home thus not causing the incident, or let her walk, but in the end each person is entitled to their mistakes. Legal Issues In the case of Susie v City of Elsewhere and Officer Ruthless, is it negligence in the part of Susie and her friends knowing that they were violating the 1 1 :Mom curfew for being in the park? Was Officer Ruthless also at fault for neglecting the comment especially after midnight, when most accidents tend to occur. Analysis/Conclusion With properly reading the statements from both Susie Marks and Officer Ruthless, it is clear that even though the Officer had told all the parties involved with Susie to and Officer Ruthless cannot be at fault for the time between 1 1 :MOM and the time of and her friends clearly did what they wanted to and as a result got involved in the accident. Justice is blind but it is the duty of each individual to look out for one another in the interest of life. Negligence on Susie Marks and her friends’ behalf led How to cite Law Factual Summary, Essays

Critically Analyze Non-Profile Story On Cyberbullying - Samples

Question: Discuss about the Critically Analyze Non-Profile Story On Cyberbullying. Answer: Introduction The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze non-profile story on cyberbullying. In this report, we will analyze six aspects so as to come up with a concrete report. The six aspects to be considered in this report include the history behind the story, the scopes covered, reasons, impacts in terms of consequences of development, countermoves in terms of gathering and action of contrary forces. Lastly, we will analyze future in terms of what could have happened if cyberbullying rolls along unchecked. These aspects will be supported by statistical data. Typically, it is also known as cyber harassment (Richard, 2013). It is a form of harassment using electronic means, especially via the internet. This type of harassment is extremely common among teenagers. It involves bullying through threats, posting rumors, sexual remarks, use of projective labels and stigmatizing victims personal information. The non-profile story will revolve around the above types of harassment in line with th e six aspects. History In this report, we consider a story where victims have been exposed to traumatic experiences. Generally, bullying can be traced from ancient times where people were being harassed by superior individuals. Later, innovation in technology was made where information could be decoded and encoded via the internet through an electronic form. Cyberbullying emerged since individuals were able to access information relating to other people via an electronic form. Thus, bullying has been occurring in the past. The story in this report relates to a victim whose personal information has been accessed without his consent (Grummit, 2007). Through this access, personal information and confidential data have landed into a stake of other individuals who have been doing cyberbullying. This victim is so worried about his confidential data that seem to be jeopardized. Consequently, the main theme, in this case, involves cases where confidential information and data of the victim have been compromised. This form of harassment can be identified by an intent to harm and repeated behavior. Many cases have been reported in the media and different authors have written articles on the same. Some of these cases include the Ryan and Halligan Case (1989-2003), the Megan Meier Case (1992-2006), the cases of Jessica Logan (1990-2008) and Hope Witsell (1996-2009). We can also consider the Tyler Clement Case (1991-2010) and the Amanda Todd Case (1996-2012). There are many cases that have not been recorded in the media. Scope In this section, we consider several factors that revolve around the story. These factors include a qualitative factor, locale factor, diversity factor and perspective factor. We focus on analyzing each factor so as to have a clear understanding of the story. Perspective factor This factor considers cyberbullying as an advanced form of bullying where parties involved do not meet face to face unlike the traditional form of bullying. In this perspective, it is performed via cyberspace. This involves the use of internet and phones to bully individuals. This factor can be drawn from the case of Amada Wood of 1996 to 2012 (Rothfuss, 2008). According to this case, Amanda started to use video chat so that she could meet new friends online. In this case, a stranger asked Amanda to post a photo of her breasts on camera. Later on, the stranger used this photo to blackmail Amanda. Finally, the photo started circulating in many social networks. Therefore, a different perspective has been applied by strangers to expose confidential details concerning people. Quantitative factor This factor indicates that majority of young teenagers all over the globe have their personal phone. This implies that many of these teens can access online services on daily basis. They can access social media and social networking online. There are many platforms of social networking that expose individuals. According to statistics, millions of people are able to connect to online social networking on daily basis. This is just a proportion of the number of victims exposed. In addition, quantitative factor provides numerical outcomes from a judgment that can be measured. Therefore, a quantitative study can be conducted so as to determine the level of bullying in the population. This form of bullying affect both genders. For example, in 2010, it was recorded among 4,400 students (Klosterboer, 2011). The quantitative data indicate the level of technology used by victims, the level of victimization, offending among other aspects that occurred in 2010. From quantitative data above, it is very clear that cyberbullying has brought victimization in both genders. Locale factor This is another scope that can be considered. The story developed in this report can apply this factor to demonstrate various aspects. In this case, we realize that there are a number of impacts on victimization (Latham, 2010). This has made many countries to enact laws so as to protect individuals from victimization. Locale factor considers law enforcement procedures. These factors are considered in teens and adult cyberbullying. Diversity factors This factor considers different aspects. This is highly diversified in different forms based on social networking. Internet trolling is among the different diversities over the internet via an online platform. Another diversity is cyberstalking that applies electronic communication to stalk a victim. This process poses threats to victims and can result in serious consequences (Harding, 2014). However, not all negative interaction on social networks are attributed to cyberbullying. Some may arise from peer pressure and can result in positive, negative or neutral impacts to parties involved. Reasons In this section, we consider the analysis of economic, social, political, legal and psychological aspects. Economic There are a number of economic aspects that can be considered. There has been a dramatic increase over the past few years. It is estimated that 10-40% of teens have experienced cyberbullying (Woods, 2014). The use of social network generate billions of dollar each year. In that connection, there are some groups of cybercriminals whose main focus is to use this platform so as to victimize people and in return demand for money. Many people have lost money from this action in order to protect their personal identity. This affects the country economically. The chart below demonstrates how social networks have used a tool to steal money from affected parties. Social Social aspects have also been affected. A lot of information has been leaked through social networks. In that connection, some of the exposed victims end up losing social status. Criminals use this platform to blackmail and victimize individuals. They also use this platform to demand money and other resources. Individuals who are unable to meet the demands are exposed (Bob Dismondy, 2010). This destroys their social life. Many families have been exposed to social networks and this brings stress to family members. It also makes them extremely overwhelmed and many feel embarrassed. Socially, cyberbullying can result in low self-esteem, withdrawal from family matters where victims spend much of their time alone. It can cause the disappearance of friends or be excluded from participating in social events. Political It has been used excessively in political aspects. It is estimated that over 70% of the information in social media is directly or indirectly connected to political aspects. This increases the possibility of political perspectives. It is known that politicians hold high profile and status. Thus, cyberbullying to a politician would result in high level of recognition from perspective factor within the scope of cyberbullying (Thomas Harker, 2009). However, some of our policy changers accept it. They argue that freedom of speech can correspond to freedom of harm. Politicians with ideological differences would accept it if used against their rivals in politics. Psychological Again, it affects victims psychologically due to stigmatization and victimization. Therefore, it is very important to educate people on effects. Many people have committed suicide. Majority of suicidal deaths occur in young teenagers who may not have the courage to face consequences (Kowalski, Limber Agatston, 2012). In order to reduce cases of psychological disorders associated with cyberbullying, the law should be enforced to limit this crime. Victims should be treated with that available psychotherapy and psychopathology. Impacts Consequences of developing this story are associated with strategies that can be applied to limit the crime. Typically, it affects people from different points of view. It can affect people socially, politically, economically, culturally and psychologically. Therefore, by developing various aspects, it is possible to identify what needs to be done so as to reduce victimization and other negative aspects (Raatma, 2013). This reduces the number of cases reported in the media. Again, development of these aspects will educate people on the importance of protecting their personal information from access by strangers who can use the information to victimize them. Countermoves Despite the increase in legal aspects enforced to inhibit cyberbullying, the number of cases reported is increasing. In this section, we analyze the gathering and action of contrary forces that as applicable in the story. The recent statistic indicates that 5% self-harm is reported. Again, 3% of victims attempt suicide and 28% of teenagers have reported cases on Twitter (Patchin Hinduja, 2012). Moreover, the statistics show that over 20% of children and teenagers indicate fear of cyber bullies thus affecting their education. Other forces that expose people should be considered so as to reduce cases that affect people of all ages. Futures This is the last aspects to be considered in the story. In this case, we consider what could happen if cyberbullying rolls along unchecked. If this development is not considered by relevant stakeholders, then evil-minded individuals will continue using social media networks to bully people (Patchin Hinduja, 2011). This will increase negative impacts. Cases on these aspects will continue to increase thus limiting confidentiality of data. It is important to design mitigation strategies that can be implemented to reduce the alarming cases. The relevant law should also be set to inhibit this crime. Relevant authorities need to be empowered so as to control what happens in social networks. There should be a reasonable limit on how to use electronic materials that encourage cyberbullying. References Bob, S. Dismondy, M. (2010). The Juice Box Bully: Empowering Kids to Stand Up for Others. Early Learning Foundation. Grummit, A. (2007). Capacity Management. Van Haren Publishing Harding, A. (2014). Urban Theory. A Critical Introduction to Power, Cities and Urbanism in the 21st Century. Sage Publication Ltd. Klosterboer, L. (2011). ITIL Capacity Management. IBM Press. Kowalski, R.M., Limber, S.P. Agatston, P.W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age. Wiley-Blackwell. Latham, J. (2010). Java. Just in Time. College Publication. Patchin, J.W. Hinduja, S. (2011). Cyberbullying Prevention and Response: Expert Perspective. Routledge. Patchin, J.W. Hinduja, S. (2012). School Climate 2.0: Preventing Cyberbullying and Sexting One Classroom at a Time. Corwin. Raatma, L. (2013). Cyberbullying (True Books: Guides to Life). Scholastic. Raatma, L. (2013). Stop Bullying (True Books). Children Pr. Richard, A. (2013). Job Satisfaction from Herzbergs Two Factor Theory Perspective. Grin publishing. Rothfuss, P. (2008). The Name of the Wind. DAW Books. Thomas, P. Harker, L. (2009). Stop Picking On Me (A First Look At Bullying). Barrons Education Series. Woods, C. (2014). Tales from the Bully Box. Elephants Bookshelf Press.